Messages in this thread |  | | From | "Rafael J. Wysocki" <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: return EEXIST instead of EBUSY for second registering | Date | Fri, 20 Sep 2013 15:30:08 +0200 |
| |
On Thursday, September 19, 2013 10:30:04 PM Yinghai Lu wrote: > On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 9:23 PM, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> wrote: > > On 20 September 2013 07:01, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> wrote: > >> Sorry, looks like this one is not enough.
Well, I've already applied this one and it makes sense to me anyway.
> >> please let me know if you prefer me send addon patch > >> or revised one. > > > > Atleast you can let us know what the problem is? And then we > > can decide on that.. But anyway, you can send a new patch > > based over latest linux-next (which will have your original patch), > > and then leave it onto Rafael to merge it or have two patches.. > > (though I am quite sure he will not drop anything now, unless its > > too screwed.., at worst he might revert it..).. > > looks like the crash is intermittent..., so i thought that patch fixed > the problem. > but later I found other suspicious print out.
So, does it mean that the $subject patch fixes the issue for you to some extent, but more changes are necessary to make it go away completely?
> please check new one: > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2915181/
I see.
I *think* we can just drop the module requesting stuff entirely, because it doesn't seem to work anyway and udev is handling this for us.
Thanks, Rafael
|  |