Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [dtc RFC PATCH] Enforce node name unit-address presence/absence | From | Benjamin Herrenschmidt <> | Date | Thu, 19 Sep 2013 17:10:53 +1000 |
| |
On Wed, 2013-09-18 at 13:41 -0700, Olof Johansson wrote: > Also, maybe warn for @0x<foo>, which is another unpreferred syntax, it > should just be @<foo> (with foo being in hex).
It can also bee @foo,bar, it doesn *have* to match the exact content of the reg property first entry. In fact it's not uncommon to use a 64-bit value here on 64-bit processors and pci uses a different encoding scheme (on real OFW at least) where they typically do @dev,fn
Yes, the fact that the unit address is not something deterministic is and has always been a major PITA though.
Cheers, Ben.
| |