lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Sep]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [dtc RFC PATCH] Enforce node name unit-address presence/absence
From
Date
On Wed, 2013-09-18 at 13:41 -0700, Olof Johansson wrote:
> Also, maybe warn for @0x<foo>, which is another unpreferred syntax, it
> should just be @<foo> (with foo being in hex).

It can also bee @foo,bar, it doesn *have* to match the exact content of
the reg property first entry. In fact it's not uncommon to use a 64-bit
value here on 64-bit processors and pci uses a different encoding scheme
(on real OFW at least) where they typically do @dev,fn

Yes, the fact that the unit address is not something deterministic is
and has always been a major PITA though.

Cheers,
Ben.




\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-09-19 09:21    [W:0.066 / U:0.620 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site