Messages in this thread | | | From | Alexander Graf <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/3] arm: kvm: clamp NR_VCPUS to MAX_VCPUS | Date | Sat, 14 Sep 2013 07:14:02 -0500 |
| |
Am 14.09.2013 um 07:10 schrieb Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>:
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com> > --- > arch/arm/kvm/arm.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c > index 741f66a2edbd7..9ebf8ac3a12ff 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c > +++ b/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c > @@ -201,7 +201,7 @@ int kvm_dev_ioctl_check_extension(long ext) > r = 1; > break; > case KVM_CAP_NR_VCPUS: > - r = num_online_cpus(); > + r = min(num_online_cpus(), KVM_MAX_VCPUS);
Is there any real reason to prohibit overcommit?
Alex
> break; > case KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPUS: > r = KVM_MAX_VCPUS; > -- > 1.8.1.4 > > _______________________________________________ > kvmarm mailing list > kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu > https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/kvmarm
| |