lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Sep]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/3] arm: kvm: clamp NR_VCPUS to MAX_VCPUS
Date


Am 14.09.2013 um 07:10 schrieb Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>:

> Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/kvm/arm.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c
> index 741f66a2edbd7..9ebf8ac3a12ff 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c
> @@ -201,7 +201,7 @@ int kvm_dev_ioctl_check_extension(long ext)
> r = 1;
> break;
> case KVM_CAP_NR_VCPUS:
> - r = num_online_cpus();
> + r = min(num_online_cpus(), KVM_MAX_VCPUS);

Is there any real reason to prohibit overcommit?

Alex

> break;
> case KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPUS:
> r = KVM_MAX_VCPUS;
> --
> 1.8.1.4
>
> _______________________________________________
> kvmarm mailing list
> kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
> https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/kvmarm


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-09-14 14:21    [W:0.151 / U:0.836 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site