lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Aug]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH V9 01/14] perf tools: add debug prints
On 07/08/13 09:44, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> Hi Adrian,
>
> On Mon, 5 Aug 2013 19:26:21 +0300, Adrian Hunter wrote:
>> It is useful to see the arguments to perf_event_open
>> and whether the perf events ring buffer was mmapped
>> per-cpu or per-thread. That information will now be
>> displayed when verbose is 2 i.e option -vv
>>
> [SNIP]
>>
>> +static size_t perf_event_attr__fprintf(struct perf_event_attr *attr, FILE *fp)
>> +{
>> + size_t ret;
>> +
>> + ret = fprintf(fp, "------------------------------------------------------------\n");
>> + ret += fprintf(fp, "perf_event_attr:\n");
>> + ret += fprintf(fp, " type %u\n", attr->type);
>> + ret += fprintf(fp, " size %u\n", attr->size);
>> + ret += fprintf(fp, " config %#"PRIx64"\n", (uint64_t)attr->config);
>> + ret += fprintf(fp, " sample_period %"PRIu64"\n", (uint64_t)attr->sample_period);
>> + ret += fprintf(fp, " sample_freq %"PRIu64"\n", (uint64_t)attr->sample_freq);
>> + ret += fprintf(fp, " sample_type %#"PRIx64"\n", (uint64_t)attr->sample_type);
>> + ret += fprintf(fp, " read_format %#"PRIx64"\n", (uint64_t)attr->read_format);
>> +
>> + ret += fprintf(fp, " disabled %u ", attr->disabled);
>> + ret += fprintf(fp, "inherit %u\n", attr->inherit);
>> + ret += fprintf(fp, " pinned %u ", attr->pinned);
>> + ret += fprintf(fp, "exclusive %u\n", attr->exclusive);
>> + ret += fprintf(fp, " exclude_user %u ", attr->exclude_user);
>> + ret += fprintf(fp, "exclude_kernel %u\n", attr->exclude_kernel);
>> + ret += fprintf(fp, " exclude_hv %u ", attr->exclude_hv);
>> + ret += fprintf(fp, "exclude_idle %u\n", attr->exclude_idle);
>> + ret += fprintf(fp, " mmap %u ", attr->mmap);
>> + ret += fprintf(fp, "comm %u\n", attr->comm);
>> + ret += fprintf(fp, " freq %u ", attr->freq);
>> + ret += fprintf(fp, "inherit_stat %u\n", attr->inherit_stat);
>> + ret += fprintf(fp, " enable_on_exec %u ", attr->enable_on_exec);
>> + ret += fprintf(fp, "task %u\n", attr->task);
>> + ret += fprintf(fp, " watermark %u ", attr->watermark);
>> + ret += fprintf(fp, "precise_ip %u\n", attr->precise_ip);
>> + ret += fprintf(fp, " mmap_data %u ", attr->mmap_data);
>> + ret += fprintf(fp, "sample_id_all %u\n", attr->sample_id_all);
>> + ret += fprintf(fp, " exclude_host %u ", attr->exclude_host);
>> + ret += fprintf(fp, "exclude_guest %u\n", attr->exclude_guest);
>> + ret += fprintf(fp, " excl.callchain.kern %u ", attr->exclude_callchain_kernel);
>> + ret += fprintf(fp, "excl.callchain.user %u\n", attr->exclude_callchain_user);
>> +
>> + ret += fprintf(fp, " wakeup_events %u\n", attr->wakeup_events);
>> + ret += fprintf(fp, " wakeup_watermark %u\n", attr->wakeup_watermark);
>> + ret += fprintf(fp, " bp_type %#x\n", attr->bp_type);
>> + ret += fprintf(fp, " bp_addr %#"PRIx64"\n", (uint64_t)attr->bp_addr);
>> + ret += fprintf(fp, " config1 %#"PRIx64"\n", (uint64_t)attr->config1);
>> + ret += fprintf(fp, " bp_len %"PRIu64"\n", (uint64_t)attr->bp_len);
>> + ret += fprintf(fp, " config2 %#"PRIx64"\n", (uint64_t)attr->config2);
>> + ret += fprintf(fp, " branch_sample_type %#"PRIx64"\n", (uint64_t)attr->branch_sample_type);
>> + ret += fprintf(fp, " sample_regs_user %#"PRIx64"\n", (uint64_t)attr->sample_regs_user);
>> + ret += fprintf(fp, " sample_stack_user %u\n", attr->sample_stack_user);
>
> Things like this likely being ended up with typo. How about this? (not tested)

And yet there aren't any typos.

>
> #define __PRINT_ATTR(fmt, cast, field) \
> fprintf(fp, " %-28s "fmt"\n", #field, cast attr->field)
>
> #define PRINT_ATTR_D32(field) __PRINT_ATTR("%u", ,field)
> #define PRINT_ATTR_X32(field) __PRINT_ATTR("%#x", ,field)
> #define PRINT_ATTR_D64(field) __PRINT_ATTR("%"PRIu64, (uint64_t), field)
> #define PRINT_ATTR_X64(field) __PRINT_ATTR("%#"PRIx64, (uint64_t), field)
> #define PRINT_ATTR2(field1, field2) \
> fprintf(fp, " %-28s %u %-28s %u\n", \
> #field1, attr->field1, #field2, attr->field2)

That does not allow the output to be nicely formatted. In some cases the
field name is just too long and I have abbreviated it.

When you add in all the variations you just get a macro mess.

>
> Thanks,
> Namhyung
>
>
>> + ret += fprintf(fp, "------------------------------------------------------------\n");
>> +
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>
>



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-08-07 10:21    [W:0.170 / U:0.948 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site