Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 07 Aug 2013 14:29:11 +0800 | From | Chen Gang <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] kernel/sysctl_binary.c: improve the usage of return value 'result' |
| |
On 08/07/2013 02:10 PM, Joe Perches wrote: > On Wed, 2013-08-07 at 13:56 +0800, Li Zefan wrote: >>>> The right answer to the code is to config it out and then you don't have >>>> to worry about it one way or another. > [] >>> Hmm... do you mean you spend 5 minutes to get a conclusion ? if so, >>> better not use word 'seems' which is not a suitable word appeared in >>> the results, proofs or conclusions. > [] >> You are too bad in english to do kernel development. You don't seem to >> know how to communicate in english... > > I don't think that's true. > > For instance, pessimization is a pretty > obscure word. Most native English speakers > could probably guess what it meant, but I > couldn't hold any low opinion of non-native > speaker that asked "what does that mean". > > The code communicates just fine. > > Chen Gang could be a bit more careful when > making significant changes to core kernel > facilities. >
OK, thanks, I really should be more careful for making patches.
> (said the guy that broke just printk) > > I think the fluent English speakers can be > tolerant reasonably well when the code is > correct and compelling (and correct). > > cheers, Joe > > >
Thank you very much for your understanding.
-- Chen Gang
| |