lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Aug]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] kernel/sysctl_binary.c: improve the usage of return value 'result'
On 08/07/2013 01:56 PM, Li Zefan wrote:
>>> The right answer to the code is to config it out and then you don't have
>>> to worry about it one way or another.
>>>
>>
>> Pardon?
>>
>> Excuse me, my English is not quite well, I don't quite understand your
>> meaning, could you please repeat again in details or say more clearly ?
>>
>>
>>> The sysctl binary path has never been properly maintained and I don't
>>> intend to start. But I will spend 5 minutes to say this patch seems to
>>> make the code worse not better.
>>>
>>
>> I guess no one ever invited you to maintain this file (for just as you
>> said, this file will be removed), so don't worry about it.
>>
>> Hmm... do you mean you spend 5 minutes to get a conclusion ? if so,
>> better not use word 'seems' which is not a suitable word appeared in
>> the results, proofs or conclusions.
>>
>
> To be honest...
>
> You are too bad in english to do kernel development. You don't seem to
> know how to communicate in english...
>

So I should improve my English, and now I am just trying improving.

At least, it is not an excuse to leave upstream kernel development, is
it right ? or do you have additional ideas or suggestions ?


> And people easily get frustrated or even pissed off when discussing with
> you. That's why tglx descided to put your emails into /dev/null...
>

If any member won't discuss with me because of my bad English, and put
my e-mail into "/dev/null", I can understand, and say sorry to them.

So I really need thank the members who still want to discuss with me.

Do you still want to discuss with me ? if not, please put my e-mail
into "/dev/null", I really can understand, and say sorry to you.

Thanks.

>> At least, one conclusion is: this patch switches from old-style to
>> new-style, not for optimization.
>>
>> But for sysctl_getname() and "checkpatch.pl" of this patch, better to
>> get more discussion.
>>
>> Is it OK ?
>
>
>


--
Chen Gang


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-08-07 08:41    [W:0.192 / U:0.124 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site