lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Aug]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH] kernel/sysctl_binary.c: improve the usage of return value 'result'
From
Date
On Wed, 2013-08-07 at 13:56 +0800, Li Zefan wrote:
> >> The right answer to the code is to config it out and then you don't have
> >> to worry about it one way or another.
[]
> > Hmm... do you mean you spend 5 minutes to get a conclusion ? if so,
> > better not use word 'seems' which is not a suitable word appeared in
> > the results, proofs or conclusions.
[]
> You are too bad in english to do kernel development. You don't seem to
> know how to communicate in english...

I don't think that's true.

For instance, pessimization is a pretty
obscure word. Most native English speakers
could probably guess what it meant, but I
couldn't hold any low opinion of non-native
speaker that asked "what does that mean".

The code communicates just fine.

Chen Gang could be a bit more careful when
making significant changes to core kernel
facilities.

(said the guy that broke just printk)

I think the fluent English speakers can be
tolerant reasonably well when the code is
correct and compelling (and correct).

cheers, Joe



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-08-07 08:41    [W:0.119 / U:0.044 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site