lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Aug]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRE: [PATCH v2 3/3] dma: Add Freescale eDMA engine driver support
Date
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vinod Koul [mailto:vinod.koul@intel.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 06, 2013 12:35 AM
> To: Lu Jingchang-B35083
> Cc: djbw@fb.com; shawn.guo@linaro.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wang Huan-B18965; Li Xiaochun-
> B41219
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] dma: Add Freescale eDMA engine driver support
> > +
> > +static void fsl_edma_free_desc(struct virt_dma_desc *vdesc) {
> > + struct fsl_edma_desc *fsl_desc;
> > + int i;
> > +
> > + fsl_desc = to_fsl_edma_desc(vdesc);
> > + for (i = 0; i < fsl_desc->n_tcds; i++)
> > + dma_pool_free(fsl_desc->echan->tcd_pool,
> > + fsl_desc->tcd[i].vtcd,
> > + fsl_desc->tcd[i].ptcd);
> > + kfree(fsl_desc);
> should this be called with lock held or not?
[Lu Jingchang-B35083]
The desc list to be freed is got with lock held, and the free for each desc is independent, and the lock is not needed. Thanks.






Best Regards,
Jingchang




\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-08-06 03:41    [W:0.399 / U:0.392 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site