[lkml]   [2013]   [Aug]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH jiffies] Avoid undefined behavior from signed overflow
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 7:28 AM, Paul E. McKenney
<> wrote:
>> Ahh, there's an error in the commit message (it says signed to unsigned).
> Good catch, fixed!

.. so I ended up waiting for that fixed version due to this email, but
it never came. Should I just apply the original and re-fix it myself?
Or is this queued up for 3.12 as being "not likely to actually
matter", which is quite possibly true (since we compile with
"-fno-strict-overflow", and thus gcc should hopefully not ever do any
transformations that depend on signed integer overflows being


 \ /
  Last update: 2013-08-04 22:01    [W:0.050 / U:7.444 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site