lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Aug]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 32/40] ARM: ux500: Delete U8500 UIB support when booting with ATAGs
    On Fri, 23 Aug 2013, Linus Walleij wrote:

    > On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 2:53 PM, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote:
    >
    > > It is not true at all that all HREFs have the STUIB mounted.
    >
    > Hm I'm confused here...
    >
    > arch/arm/boot/dts/[ste-]stuib.dtsi does define this stuff
    > so forget about the misplaced comments.
    >
    > For *all* HREF boards. As it is included from both
    > [ste-]hrefprev60.dts and [ste-]hrefv60plus.dts
    >
    > However it is only really mounted on some of the HREFs,
    > and the following stays valid:
    >
    > > This detection needs to stay for now, unless we go and define
    > > in the device tree which UIB is mounted, which would be unfortunate
    > > as we can very well auto-detect it, and that makes it easier for
    > > a user to just swap the UIB and test the other toch screen
    > > (for example).
    >
    > So it would be really nice to keep this autodetection.
    >
    > What would be nice if we could mark all the STUIB as
    > "disabled" in the device trees, and then augment the device tree
    > at boot depending on if we find something at 0x44 as in this
    > test:
    >
    > > - /* U8500-UIB has the TC35893 at 0x44 on I2C0, the ST-UIB doesn't. */
    > > - ret = i2c_smbus_xfer(i2c0, 0x44, 0, I2C_SMBUS_WRITE, 0,
    > > - I2C_SMBUS_QUICK, NULL);
    >
    > And then mark these as "okay" in the DT.
    >
    > That's pretty high-tech but I bet we can pull it off (and set
    > a good example).

    Well, this stuff is possible, but it doesn't really have anything to
    do with this patch-set. We can reuse 'some' of this code, but we'd need
    to think of a new way to represent it. That coupled with the fact that
    the Device Tree boot doesn't use any of this stuff yet leads to
    believe we can keep this removal patch in the set and re-introduce the
    key parts when we've had a chat about the new implementation.

    --
    Lee Jones
    Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead
    Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
    Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
    --
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2013-08-27 10:21    [W:4.207 / U:0.216 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site