Messages in this thread - First message in thread
- "Lee, Chun-Yi"
- "Lee, Chun-Yi"
- "Lee, Chun-Yi"
- "Lee, Chun-Yi"
- "Lee, Chun-Yi"
- "Lee, Chun-Yi"
- "Lee, Chun-Yi"
- "Lee, Chun-Yi"
- "Lee, Chun-Yi"
- "Lee, Chun-Yi"
- "Lee, Chun-Yi"
- "Lee, Chun-Yi"
- "Lee, Chun-Yi"
- "Lee, Chun-Yi"
- "Lee, Chun-Yi"
- "Lee, Chun-Yi"
- "Lee, Chun-Yi"
- "Lee, Chun-Yi"
- "Lee, Chun-Yi"
- Florian Weimer
| | | Date | Sun, 25 Aug 2013 18:01:47 +0200 | From | Pavel Machek <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 03/18] asymmetric keys: separate the length checking of octet string from RSA_I2OSP |
| |
On Thu 2013-08-22 19:01:42, Lee, Chun-Yi wrote: > Due to RSA_I2OSP is not only used by signature verification path but also used > in signature generation path. So, separate the length checking of octet string > because it's not for generate 0x00 0x01 leading string when used in signature > generation. > > Reviewed-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> > Signed-off-by: Lee, Chun-Yi <jlee@suse.com>
> +static int RSA_I2OSP(MPI x, size_t xLen, u8 **_X) > +{ > + unsigned x_size; > + unsigned X_size; > + u8 *X = NULL;
Is this kernel code or entry into obfuscated C code contest? This is not funny.
Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
| |