Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 24 Aug 2013 04:06:28 +0100 | From | Matthew Garrett <> | Subject | Re: ACPI vs Device Tree - moving forward |
| |
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 07:55:31PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> Question is: Does this work _today_ with any existing driver, where > one interrupt is served through ACPI and another as 'standard' Linux > interrupt ? If yes, it must be working, and using fdt to describe > the interrupt mapping for the non-ACPI interrupt should not make > a difference. If no, the problem does not really have anything > to do with fdt.
There's no such thing as an ACPI interrupt, it's just a data source in the same way that PnP used to be. _CRS refers to platform interrupts.
-- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org
| |