Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 23 Aug 2013 08:34:00 -0400 | From | Tejun Heo <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 11/11] cpuset: export effective masks to userspace |
| |
Hello,
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 03:53:37PM +0800, Li Zefan wrote: > It seems confusing if there're two interaces but they actually mean > the same thing. > > Another reason I didn't do this is, they're not always the same. When > !sane, If cpus_allowed is empty, effective_cpus is not empty, and you > are not able to put tasks into this cpuset. So if we want to expose > it unconditionally, I'll make sure cpus_allowed == effective_cpus > always stand when !sane.
Do you think that'll be convoluted? Otherwise, sounds like a nice thing to do anyway.
Thanks.
-- tejun
| |