Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: rfc: trivial patches and slow deaths? | From | Joe Perches <> | Date | Tue, 20 Aug 2013 21:10:07 -0700 |
| |
On Tue, 2013-08-20 at 20:36 -0500, Rob Landley wrote: > On 08/20/2013 07:22:36 PM, Joe Perches wrote: > > I'm also saying that the trivial tree should > > have some visibility about whether or not a > > patch or series will be handled by the trivial > > maintainer or not. [] > > Jiri has not responded to this point. > He did. Twice.
Not really.
> > Silence about the status of patches that extends > > for months is not good. > > He has a public git tree.
Yes, I know.
> I've found that if a patch isn't in there, he hasn't picked > it up yet.
It's the visibility of if/yet/when for the trivial patches submitted and unresponded to that's the question.
And no, Jiri hasn't responded with any intention of making any such scheme public.
I think a public patchwork queue like netdev's could work reasonably well.
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/list/
| |