Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 19 Aug 2013 14:11:23 +0200 | From | Wolfram Sang <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] i2c-omap: always send stop after nack |
| |
Hi,
> > Which means your original patch starts to make a lot more sense. I > > wonder is this is really what we should be doing though - breaking out > > of the loop, I mean.
Yup, that is fine. I applied the old patch with Acks from Hein and Felipe to -next. Thanks!
> It looks like TI's i2c-davinci will have the same problem as i2c-omap, > and will need the same change.
Somebody up for this?
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |