lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Aug]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] i2c-omap: always send stop after nack
Hi,

> > Which means your original patch starts to make a lot more sense. I
> > wonder is this is really what we should be doing though - breaking out
> > of the loop, I mean.

Yup, that is fine. I applied the old patch with Acks from Hein and
Felipe to -next. Thanks!

> It looks like TI's i2c-davinci will have the same problem as i2c-omap,
> and will need the same change.

Somebody up for this?

[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-08-19 14:21    [W:2.150 / U:0.484 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site