lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Aug]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Reading perf counters at ftrace trace boundaries

On 13-08-11 10:47 PM, Andi Kleen wrote:
> That's what normal sampling already does.
>
> If you're worried about systematic shadow effects just randomize a bit.

That's actually the point. I'd like to be able to study/compare both
approaches. I could be completely off, but I'd like to see if a divide
and conquer approach (i.e. based on ftrace) wouldn't take the guesswork
out of smart randomization. Just a hunch.

--
Karim Yaghmour
CEO - Opersys inc. / www.opersys.com
http://twitter.com/karimyaghmour



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-08-12 04:21    [W:0.037 / U:0.760 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site