Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 10 Aug 2013 18:10:31 +0200 | From | Andi Kleen <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 10/13] x86: Move cond resched for copy_{from,to}_user into low level code 64bit |
| |
> Most of this series looks fine, but I really think that we > could/should just take that extra step, and say "no, user accesses > don't imply that we need to check for scheduling".
Hmm. I can do that, but wouldn't that make CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY mostly equivalent to CONFIG_PREEMPT_NONE?
Need to check how many other reschedule tests are left then for VOLUNTARY.
-Andi
-- ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
| |