lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Aug]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 10/13] x86: Move cond resched for copy_{from,to}_user into low level code 64bit
> Most of this series looks fine, but I really think that we
> could/should just take that extra step, and say "no, user accesses
> don't imply that we need to check for scheduling".

Hmm. I can do that, but wouldn't that make CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY
mostly equivalent to CONFIG_PREEMPT_NONE?

Need to check how many other reschedule tests are left then for VOLUNTARY.

-Andi

--
ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-08-10 18:41    [W:0.321 / U:0.044 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site