lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Jul]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH] uio: uio_pci_generic: Add support for MSI interrupts
On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 10:20:23AM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 10:00:52AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 10:45:01AM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 03:30:23PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > > Enable support for MSI interrupts if the device supports it.
> > > > Since MSI interrupts are edge triggered, it is no longer necessary to
> > > > disable interrupts in the kernel and re-enable them from user-space.
> > > > Instead, clearing the interrupt condition in the user space application
> > > > automatically re-enables the interrupt.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
> > > > ---
> > > > An open question is if we can just do this unconditionally
> > > > or if there should be some flag to enable it. A module parameter, maybe ?
> > >
> > > NACK
> > >
> > > UIO is for devices that don't do memory writes.
> > > Anything that can do writes must be protected by an IOMMU
> > > and/or have a secure kernel driver, not a UIO stub.
> > >
> > > MSI is done by memory writes so if userspace
> > > controls the device it can trick it to write
> > > anywhere in memory.
> > >
> > Just out of curiosity: Since MSI support is mandatory for all PCIE devices,
> > isn't that possible anyway, even if MSI is not enabled by the kernel ?
> > All one would need to do is to enable MSI from user space; after all,
> > the chip configuration space is writable.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Guenter
>
> If a device has capability to do writes, sure. So don't do this then :)
>
Not an option. I need to use MSI.

Not that it matters anymore - turns out it was better writing a specific driver
for my devices anyway; I needed to be able to disable chip interrupts before
unloading the driver. But why is it then a reason to NACK this patch ?
Besides, doesn't one have to be root anyway to perform such activities,
which could then be more easily accomplished by writing into /dev/mem ?

Thanks,
Guenter


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-07-04 17:01    [W:0.081 / U:0.124 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site