Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 27 Jul 2013 10:53:01 +0200 | From | Richard Cochran <> | Subject | Re: DT bindings as ABI [was: Do we have people interested in device tree janitoring / cleanup?] |
| |
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 11:15:24AM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 06:54:33AM +0200, Richard Cochran wrote: > > I too work on commercial embedded systems, and DT has proven to be > > one gigantic *PITA*. > > Why do you think our experiences are so different?
Here are a few recent examples:
* What happens when one wants to boot vanilla kernel on the beaglebone?
http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg198431.html
* Wanting already merged code to work is too much to ask.
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-omap/msg79731.html
* When people try in good faith to conduct methodical boot tests, DT is working against them.
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-omap/msg79960.html
Thanks, Richard
| |