Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 26 Jul 2013 14:29:40 -0400 | From | Rik van Riel <> | Subject | Re: RFC: revert request for cpuidle patches e11538d1 and 69a37bea |
| |
On 07/26/2013 02:27 PM, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > On 7/26/2013 11:13 AM, Rik van Riel wrote: > >> >> Could you try running the tests with just the repeat mode >> stuff from commit 69a37bea excluded, but leaving the common >> infrastructure and commit e11538? >> > > personally I think we should go the other way around. > revert the set entirely first, and now, and get our performance back > to what it should be > > and then see what we can add back without causing the regressions. > this may take longer, or be done in steps, and that's ok. > > the end point may well be the same... but we can then evaluate in the right > direction.
Works for me. I have no objection to reverting both patches, if the people planning to fix the code prefer that :)
-- All rights reversed
| |