[lkml]   [2013]   [Jul]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [Ksummit-2013-discuss] DT bindings as ABI [was: Do we have people interested in device tree janitoring / cleanup?]
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 03:09:29PM +0200, Richard Cochran wrote:

> Unless I totally misunderstood, the thread is talking about letting
> established bindings change with each new kernel version. I am
> opposed to that.

No, nobody is really saying that is a particularly good idea. There is
some debate about how we work out what an established binding is but
there's no serious suggestion that we don't want stable bindings.
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-07-26 16:21    [W:0.130 / U:55.140 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site