Messages in this thread | | | From | Zhu Richard-R65037 <> | Subject | RE: linux-next: Tree for Jul 25 (ahci_imx.c) | Date | Fri, 26 Jul 2013 04:58:14 +0000 |
| |
Hi Shawn: yes, it is.
BTW, Should I re-send the AHCI_IMX patch-set or send out one stand-alone patch to fix this issue?
Hi Tejun: What's your opinion?
Best Regards Richard Zhu
-----Original Message----- From: Shawn Guo [mailto:shawn.guo@linaro.org] Sent: Friday, July 26, 2013 12:04 PM To: Zhu Richard-R65037 Cc: Randy Dunlap; Stephen Rothwell; linux-next@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-ide@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Jul 25 (ahci_imx.c)
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 03:46:42AM +0000, Zhu Richard-R65037 wrote: > -----Original Message----- > From: Randy Dunlap [mailto:rdunlap@infradead.org] > Sent: Friday, July 26, 2013 2:32 AM > To: Stephen Rothwell > Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-ide@vger.kernel.org; Zhu Richard-R65037 > Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Jul 25 (ahci_imx.c) > > On 07/24/13 22:12, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Changes since 20130724: > > > > on i386: > > # CONFIG_MFD_SYSCON is not set > > > when ahci_imx.c is built as a loadable module: > > ERROR: "syscon_regmap_lookup_by_compatible" [drivers/ata/ahci_imx.ko] undefined! > > or when it is builtin: > > ahci_imx.c:(.text+0x182e54): undefined reference to `syscon_regmap_lookup_by_compatible' >
We should have it depend on MFD_SYSCON.
Shawn
| |