lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Jul]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v6 6/8] cpufreq:exynos:Extend Exynos cpufreq driver to support boost framework
On Fri, 26 Jul 2013 15:56:53 +0530 Viresh Kumar wrote,
> On 25 July 2013 22:03, Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com> wrote:
>
> > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c
> > b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c index 9ae1871..175172d9 100644
> > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c
> > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c
> > @@ -270,6 +270,9 @@ static int exynos_cpufreq_cpu_exit(struct
> > cpufreq_policy *policy)
> >
> > static struct freq_attr *exynos_cpufreq_attr[] = {
> > &cpufreq_freq_attr_scaling_available_freqs,
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_BOOST_SW
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [*]
>
> Use ARM_EXYNOS_CPU_FREQ_BOOST_SW instead.

For the reasons explained at [PATCH v6 5/8] I would prefer to leave [*]
here.

>
> > + &cpufreq_freq_attr_scaling_boost_freqs,
> > +#endif
> > NULL,
> > };
> >
> > @@ -332,6 +335,9 @@ static int __init exynos_cpufreq_probe(struct
> > platform_device *pdev)
> >
> > locking_frequency = exynos_getspeed(0);
> >
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_BOOST_SW
> > + exynos_driver.boost_supported = true;
> > +#endif
>
> So, why here and not in the definition of exynos_driver?

Right. I will move this to struct cpufreq_driver exynos_driver.

>
> > register_pm_notifier(&exynos_cpufreq_nb);
> >
> > if (cpufreq_register_driver(&exynos_driver)) {
> > --
> > 1.7.10.4
> >



--
Best regards,

Lukasz Majewski

Samsung R&D Institute Poland (SRPOL) | Linux Platform Group

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-07-26 13:41    [W:0.258 / U:16.012 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site