lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Jul]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v6 1/8] cpufreq: Store cpufreq policies in a list
From
On 26 July 2013 16:28, Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Jul 2013 15:44:29 +0530 Viresh Kumar viresh.kumar@linaro.org
> wrote,
>> On 25 July 2013 22:03, Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com> wrote:

>> Looks good but would have been better if you could have moved
>> existing code to use this infrastructure..
>>
>> For example, this code in __cpufreq_add_dev()
>>
>> #ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
>> /* Check if this cpu was hot-unplugged earlier and has
>> siblings */ read_lock_irqsave(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags);
>> for_each_online_cpu(sibling) {
>>
>> ---
>>
>> }
>> read_unlock_irqrestore(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags);
>> #endif
>
> Do you mean to write something like:
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_BOOST_SW
> write_lock_irqsave(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags);
> list_add(&policy->policy_list, &cpufreq_policy_list);
> write_unlock_irqrestore(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags);
> #endif
>
> Or Am I missing something?

I can't imaging how you though I am saying this :)

The code I mentioned actually requires to iterate through the
list of available policies but was iterating over all online cpus..

And so your new infrastructure or this list can be used instead
of looping for all cpus.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-07-26 13:21    [W:0.254 / U:15.628 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site