lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Jul]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [Ksummit-2013-discuss] DT bindings as ABI [was: Do we have people interested in device tree janitoring / cleanup?]
    On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 02:11:31PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:

    > I would argue that little has gone in (if reviewed) with the
    > expectation that the binding will change. Many of the common bindings
    > have had many rounds of review and they have not changed. My position
    > any time I see an incompatible change has been that it require anyone
    > affected to be okay with the change. This has pretty much been limited
    > to specific platforms from what I've seen.

    The big exception I've seen has been the OMAP hwmod stuff. Plus of
    course the case where things get moved into the DT bindings from the
    board file as things are built up, but this should be becoming a non
    issue as people move onto DT only boards (though I am worried about
    people on systems where the SoC is described in DT).
    [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2013-07-26 13:21    [W:8.264 / U:0.024 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site