lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Jul]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH, re-send] Always trap on BUG()
On 07/26/2013 06:05 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Chen Gang <gang.chen@asianux.com> wrote:
>
>> On 07/23/2013 05:36 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>>
>>> (the crazies can keep a separate patch to remove even more of BUG() to win
>>> a K or two.)
>>>
>>
>> Excuse me, my English is not quite well, I do not quite understand your
>> meaning, could you please repeat again in details or say more clearly ?
>
> I meant: those people who'd like to have the tiny
> additional space savings offered by !CONFIG_BUG (and are
> crazy enough to live with non-determinism in exchange for a
> measly payment of 1 KB), can apply a separate, out of tree
> patch just fine and don't need upstream kernel support.
>

Thank you for your reply in details.


Thanks
--
Chen Gang


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-07-26 03:41    [W:2.313 / U:0.024 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site