Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 25 Jul 2013 14:55:47 +0100 | From | Mark Brown <> | Subject | Re: How to create IRQ mappings in a GPIO driver that doesn't control its IRQ domain ? |
| |
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 03:22:29PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > On Thursday 25 July 2013 14:15:56 Mark Brown wrote:
> > Are the interrupts in a contiguous block in the controller so you can just > > pass around the controller and a base number?
> In two of the three SoCs I need to fix they are. I've just realized that in > the last one the interrupts are in two contiguous blocks in two different > parents. I will thus need at least a list of <parent-phandle base count>. Our > standard interrupt bindings don't seem to support multiple parents, is that > something that we want to fix or should I go for custom bindings ?
It seems reasonable to define the bindings in a generic way in case other people have the same problem but it's possible I may be missing a trick regarding how to do this in DT so don't take my word for it. [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |