lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Jul]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 10/53] Input: atmel_mxt_ts - Add memory access interface via sysfs
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 09:16:16AM -0700, Nick Dyer wrote:
> Mark Brown wrote:

> > Yes, to be honest. I'd hope it wouldn't be increasing the number of
> > read/write operations...

> For some operations it does. For example updating the whole chip config
> (which is a common thing to want to do), it would turn a couple of write
> operations into ~20 on recent chips.

Is that really happening on peformance critical paths other than initial
power up (which could be handled more neatly anyway).

> > That still sounds like something the driver can handle (for example, by
> > eating the first error silently if it knows the chip is powered down)

> We've tried to implement this idea of tracking the chip power state in
> the driver and only eating the first error silently when necessary. But
> there are various entertaining corner cases (for example, it may or may
> not be in sleep on probe, how do you deal with intermittent i2c glitch). It
> would end up either being very brittle or an extremely complex mechanism
> involving tracking state and timers, the result of which is only to
> suppress a dmesg debug output saying "i2c retry", and to fail very slightly
> earlier in the normal i2c failure case. The normal fast path through
> this code is exactly the same.

It seems very suspicous that this device has all these problems but
others don't...

> > and of course a system integrator may choose not to copy the reference
> > design in this respect, it does seem a bit odd after all.

> You're being a bit optimistic there. Examples of devices that require
> this are Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1, Asus Transformer TF101.

If absoluely nobody has used the separate wakeup pin then the hardware
designers are wasting a pin there... my point isn't that nobody would
use the reference design it's that some boards will have the separate
signal.
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-07-02 20:21    [W:0.102 / U:0.260 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site