lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Jul]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: strange crashes in tcp_poll() via epoll_wait
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-07-19 at 23:50 +0000, Eric Wong wrote:
> > Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Hi Al
> > >
> > > I tried to debug strange crashes in tcp_poll() called from
> > > sys_epoll_wait() -> sock_poll()
> > >
> > > The symptom is that sock->sk is NULL and we therefore dereference a NULL
> > > pointer.
> > >
> > > It's really rare crashes but still, it would be nice to understand where
> > > is the bug. Presumably latest kernels would crash in sock_poll() because
> > > of the sk_can_busy_loop(sock->sk) call.
> > >
> > > We do test sock->sk being NULL in sock_fasync(), but epoll should be
> > > safe because of existing synchronization (epmutex) ?
> >
> > It should be safe because of ep->mtx, actually, as epmutex is not taken
> > in sys_epoll_wait.
>
> Hmm, it might be more complex than that for multi threaded programs :
>
> eventpoll_release_file()
>
> The problem might be because a thread closes a socket while an event
> was queued for it.

But ep->mtx is also held when traversing the ready list with
ep_send_events_proc.

Can sock->sk somehow be NULL before hitting eventpoll_release_file?

> > I took a look at this but have not found anything. I've yet to see this
> > this on my machines.
> >
> > When did you start noticing this?
>
> Hard to say, but we have these crashes on a 3.3+ based kernel.

So I don't think any of my epoll changes caused it. Phew!

> Probability of said crashes is very very low.

This still worries me since I rely heavily on multi-threaded epoll. I
don't have a lot of cores/CPUs, though, so maybe it's harder to trigger
any potential race as a result...


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-07-20 04:41    [W:0.036 / U:2.252 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site