lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Jul]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v5 2/7] cpufreq: Add boost frequency support in core
On Wed, 17 Jul 2013 10:58:40 +0530 Viresh Kumar viresh.kumar@linaro.org
wrote,
> On 16 July 2013 17:36, Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 15:11:54 +0530 Viresh Kumar
> > viresh.kumar@linaro.org wrote,
> >> On 4 July 2013 14:20, Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com>
> >> wrote:
>
> >> > +void cpufreq_set_boost_enabled(int state)
> > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [*]
> >
> >>
> >> Maybe cpufreq_block_boost? As suggested by Rafael.
> >
> > What do you mean by cpufreq_block_boost()? This name would reverse
> > the logic.
> >
> > Function [*] is used to change boost_enabled static flag (defined at
> > cpufreq.c file) state according to acpi-cpufreq.c boost support
> > status.
>
> I misread it again :(
>
> So, what about adding another field in struct cpufreq_driver:
> boost_enabled? And get rid of the global boost_enabled we have used?
> Similar to how boost_supported is used, then we don't need this
> routine.

Ok, I will implement this.

--
Best regards,

Lukasz Majewski

Samsung R&D Institute Poland (SRPOL) | Linux Platform Group


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-07-17 09:41    [W:0.183 / U:0.028 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site