Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Wed, 17 Jul 2013 09:15:38 +0800 | From | Gu Zheng <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH RESEND 1/2] fs/anon_inode: Introduce a new lib function anon_inode_getfile_private() |
| |
Hi Ben,
On 07/16/2013 09:16 PM, Benjamin LaHaise wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 05:56:12PM +0800, Gu Zheng wrote: >> >> Introduce a new lib function anon_inode_getfile_private(), it creates a new file >> instance by hooking it up to an anonymous inode, and a dentry that describe the >> "class" of the file, similar to anon_inode_getfile(), but each file holds a >> single inode. Furthermore, anyone who wants to create a private anon file will >> benefit from this change. >> >> Signed-off-by: Gu Zheng <guz.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> >> Signed-off-by: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@kvack.org> > > Please don't add my Signed-off-by when I have never even seen or reviewed > a patch -- that is completely unacceptable.
Sorry for my reckless action, I'll remember your reminder.:)
> Second, I don't think this > patch is suitable for 3.11, as it has not seen much testing outside of one > test program I had written. It's a long standing bug, so it isn't urgent > to get the fix into the tree. That said, it did pass a few tests I ran > last night, so it is probably suitable for the -next tree.
Thanks for your test.:)
Regards, Gu
> > As for patch 1, it looks okay to me, but will need Al Viro's signoff. > > -ben
|  |