lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Jul]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/4] pinctrl: Remove duplicate code in pinctrl_pm_select_state functions
Hi Tony,

On 07/16/2013 04:41 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com> [130716 06:22]:
>> Hi Tony,
>>
>> This patch causes boot failure when I've applied my patch
>> "[RFC] ARM: OMAP2+: omap_device: add pinctrl handling"
>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/6/21/309
>>
>> on top of it:
>
> Hmm this patch alone removes duplicate code and if it causes
> issues I must have made a typo somewhere.

No typo :) You've removed the check for !dev-pins.
And the failure place is:
int pinctrl_pm_select_active_state(struct device *dev)
{
return pinctrl_pm_select_state(dev, dev->pins->active_state);
^^^^ here
}

If I understand everything right, the pinctrl support in Device core
assumed to be optional - so, It's valid case, when there are no
definition for device's pinctrl in DT at all.

And in this case dev->pins == NULL and pinctrl_pm_select_*() API
should return 0 always.

>
> I cannot see a typo though, but in your dmesg I see something..
>
>> [ 0.610565] PC is at pinctrl_pm_select_active_state+0x4/0xc
Yep. This will happen if there are no pinctrl states defined in DT
- currently it's crashed when GPIO driver probed.
>
> ..looks like you have something applied for the active_state
> that only gets introduced later on in this series.
>
> Maybe you have the earlier version of drivers/base/pinctrl.c
> active_state patch that was in linux next for a while but
> got reverted as we noticed we had to rework some things?
>
> So maybe try with v3.11-rc1 + these four patches + your
> omap_device patch?
I'm on v3.11-rc1

>
> Regards,
>
> Tony
>



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-07-16 17:01    [W:0.052 / U:47.608 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site