lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Jul]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v5 3/7] cpufreq:acpi:x86: Adjust the acpi-cpufreq.c code to work with common boost solution
On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 15:34:02 +0530 Viresh Kumar viresh.kumar@linaro.org
wrote,
> On 4 July 2013 14:20, Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com> wrote:
> > static void __init acpi_cpufreq_boost_init(void)
> > @@ -953,33 +937,22 @@ static void __init
> > acpi_cpufreq_boost_init(void) if (!msrs)
> > return;
> >
> > - boost_supported = true;
> > - boost_enabled = boost_state(0);
> > + cpufreq_set_boost_enabled(boost_state(0));
> > + acpi_cpufreq_driver.boost_supported = true;
>
> You are again doing the same mistake. Boost must be
> always supported for acpi-cpufreq with read permissions, as it was
> earlier.

The boost attribute is exported to sysfs only when boost is supported
by the driver (as we had agreed earlier).

The problem here is that the original acpi-cpufreq.c file had two
static flags:
static bool boost_enabled, boost_supported;

Both of them are not needed at acpi-cpufreq, since:
1. boost_enabled is defined at cpufreq.c core file.
2. boost_supported is defined at struct cpufreq_driver
(acpi_cpufreq_driver).

I've reused the boost_supported from acpi_cpufreq_driver structure to
avoid code duplication.


--
Best regards,

Lukasz Majewski

Samsung R&D Institute Poland (SRPOL) | Linux Platform Group


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-07-16 14:01    [W:0.391 / U:9.616 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site