lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Jul]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 16/18] sched: Avoid overloading CPUs on a preferred NUMA node
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 09:23:42AM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 10:03:21PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 04:20:18PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > > ---
> > > + src_eff_load = 100 + (imbalance_pct - 100) / 2;
> > > + src_eff_load *= power_of(src_cpu);
> > > + src_eff_load *= src_load + effective_load(tg, src_cpu, -weight, -weight);
> >
> > So did you try with this effective_load() term 'missing'?
> >
>
> Yes, it performed worse in tests. Looking at it, I figured that it would
> have to perform worse unless effective_load regularly returns negative
> values.

In this case it would return negative, seeing as we put a negative in.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-07-16 13:21    [W:0.080 / U:11.628 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site