lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Jul]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC 1/2] ASoC: dmaengine-pcm: Add support for querying DMA capabilities
On 07/15/2013 09:51 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 08:20:28PM +0200, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
>> On 07/15/2013 07:57 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 10:27:21PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
>
>>> Right, we probably want to set an artificial floor here but it still
>>> seems like we should be checking that the device actually supports this.
>>> If the hardware can only support 64 bytes then the above code won't work
>>> properly.
>
>> It shouldn't be to hard to extend the dma_caps API with a
>> min_sg_len. But is this something you've actually seen in existing
>> hardware for that the driver would make use of the dmaengine PCM
>> framework? If it is more of theoretical nature we can still easily
>> add it later if it becomes necessary.
>
> I'm not aware of anything but equally well I made zero effort to look
> and note that quite a few existing drivers appear to have minimum values
> quite a bit above 16 though I doubt they are all actual restrictions.

I would assume that most of them don't express hardware limitations but
rather are sensible lower limits which allow operation without
over-/underruns. But that's something that doesn't necessarily depend on the
DMA controller, but rather on the system as a whole, e.g. on a slower
machine you'd typically set the limit higher so the CPU has a better chance
to keep up. So this isn't something you'd want to set in the DMA controller
driver. But I'm not sure if there is a good way to calculate a sensible
minimum buffer size based on the whole system's constraints.

- Lars



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-07-16 11:41    [W:0.057 / U:11.756 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site