Messages in this thread |  | | Subject | Re: [Ksummit-2013-discuss] KS Topic request: Handling the Stable kernel, let's dump the cc: stable tag | From | Steven Rostedt <> | Date | Mon, 15 Jul 2013 23:43:09 -0400 |
| |
On Tue, 2013-07-16 at 13:27 +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
> > I also heard some managers decided their kernel source packages should > > have all the patches squashed together to make them harder to cherry- > > pick... could it have been the same company? > > Greg loves to tell stories about RH management, but really if he can > find any engineer who works for RH that says he can't work on stable > due to being told by management, I'd be surprised. Maybe when stable > first surfaced there was a hope of it being close to RHEL, but at this > point stable has little to no usefulness from a RHEL point of view, > and since nearly all the RH employed maintainers all do stable work, I > can't see why Greg would think this matters.
And to stress that point. I myself work for Red Hat, and I'm very big into the stable tree. Heck, I maintain a 3.6 stable (not as well as "Greg" does, but I'm just a mere mortal).
I don't know what managers Greg talked to, but I've been encouraged by management to mark bug fixes with the stable tag.
-- Steve
|  |