[lkml]   [2013]   [Jul]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [ATTEND] How to act on LKML (was: [ 00/19] 3.10.1-stable review)
    On Tue, 2013-07-16 at 13:14 +1000, NeilBrown wrote:

    > Surely there is an enormous difference between being required to defend your
    > position against rational and forceful argument, and being required to defend
    > it against irrelevant name calling.

    Sure, but I don't think there's really much name calling in the kernel

    I just scanned a large number of LKML emails, and they all seemed rather
    technical, and no personal attacks at all. And that included several
    emails from Linus as well. Probably the strongest email came from Thomas
    Gleixner, but even that didn't contain any personal name calling. Mostly
    he called stuff "crap" but that was about the code and claims that the
    code did, but not about the person.

    There are a few times that Linus gets a bit colorful with his
    criticisms, but that's really the minority of the email and not the
    overall tone. I think Linus picks his battles. Sometimes he goes
    overboard, but he's human. But I still think he's running this ship

    -- Steve

     \ /
      Last update: 2013-07-16 05:41    [W:4.235 / U:2.392 seconds]
    ©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site