Messages in this thread |  | | From | Chris Ball <> | Subject | Re: [ATTEND] How to act on LKML | Date | Tue, 16 Jul 2013 03:43:37 +0100 |
| |
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 16 2013, Darren Hart wrote: > On Mon, 2013-07-15 at 15:36 -0700, Sarah Sharp wrote: >> The people who want to work together in a civil manner should get >> together and create a "Kernel maintainer's code of conduct" that >> outlines what they expect from fellow kernel developers. The people who >> want to continue acting "unprofessionally" should document what >> behaviors set off their cursing streaks, so that others can avoid that >> behavior. Somewhere in the middle is the community behavior all >> developers can thrive in. >> >> Some people won't agree with everything in that document. The point is, >> they don't have to agree. They can read the document, figure out what >> the community expects, and figure out whether they can modify their >> behavior to match. If they are unwilling to change, they simply don't >> have to work with the developers who have signed it. >> >> Perhaps a trusted third party could take a stab at a first draft of this >> document? Greg KH? Steve Rostedt? Darren Hart? > > [..] > I do believe that someone from the intended audience of a document > should be the one to write the first draft (or they should be among the > reviewers if the authority drafts the document). For instance, I > believe I would be able to document how to work with -tip or -stable as > an individual contributor. I would not be a good candidate for writing > the "how to be a lieutenant to Linus" because I am neither Linus nor > one of his lieutenants.
Here's a simple statement that I hope many kernel developers would sign up for -- I'd be happy to make it for the subsystem I maintain:
* If there's something wrong with your patch, I will critique the code respectfully, without personal attacks or public humiliation.
I'd like other developers to treat me this way too, but perhaps a good way to get started is to first come up with a statement of how we'd like to treat others, and then start collecting signatories to it. Does that sound like a good idea?
Thanks,
- Chris. -- Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org> <http://printf.net/>
|  |