lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Jul]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/9] mm, hugetlb: clean-up and possible bug fix
On 07/16/2013 09:10 AM, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 07:40:16PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
>> Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> writes:
>>
>>> First 5 patches are almost trivial clean-up patches.
>>>
>>> The others are for fixing three bugs.
>>> Perhaps, these problems are minor, because this codes are used
>>> for a long time, and there is no bug reporting for these problems.
>>>
>>> These patches are based on v3.10.0 and
>>> passed sanity check of libhugetlbfs.
>> does that mean you had run with libhugetlbfs test suite ?
> Yes! I can't find any reggression on libhugetlbfs test suite.

Where can get your test case?

>
>>
>> -aneesh
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-07-16 04:01    [W:0.121 / U:4.588 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site