Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 16 Jul 2013 09:27:29 +0800 | From | Sam Ben <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/9] mm, hugetlb: clean-up and possible bug fix |
| |
On 07/16/2013 09:10 AM, Joonsoo Kim wrote: > On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 07:40:16PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote: >> Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> writes: >> >>> First 5 patches are almost trivial clean-up patches. >>> >>> The others are for fixing three bugs. >>> Perhaps, these problems are minor, because this codes are used >>> for a long time, and there is no bug reporting for these problems. >>> >>> These patches are based on v3.10.0 and >>> passed sanity check of libhugetlbfs. >> does that mean you had run with libhugetlbfs test suite ? > Yes! I can't find any reggression on libhugetlbfs test suite.
Where can get your test case?
> >> >> -aneesh >> >> -- >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in >> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |