| Date | Thu, 11 Jul 2013 13:53:16 -0700 | From | "H. Peter Anvin" <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/2 v3] x86: introduce int3-based instruction patching |
| |
On 07/11/2013 01:26 PM, Jiri Kosina wrote: > > synchronization after replacing "all but first" instructions should not > be necessary (on Intel hardware), as the syncing after the subsequent > patching of the first byte provides enough safety. > But there's not only Intel HW out there, and we'd rather be on a safe > side. >
Has anyone talked to AMD or VIA about this at all? Did anyone else ever make SMP-capable x86?
-hpa
|