lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Jul]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH V5 09/12] perf: make events stream always parsable
On 7/11/13 9:43 AM, David Ahern wrote:
> On 7/11/13 7:12 AM, Adrian Hunter wrote:
>> The event stream is not always parsable because the format of a sample
>> is dependent on the sample_type of the selected event. When there
>> is more than one selected event and the sample_types are not the
>> same then parsing becomes problematic. A sample can be matched to its
>> selected event using the ID that is allocated when the event is opened.
>> Unfortunately, to get the ID from the sample means first parsing it.
>
> Here's an alternative suggestion -- one that does not involve changing
> the kernel API or requiring a common denominator in sample_type options.
>
> perf handles event streams through an mmap which can be directly tied to
> an evsel (a single event) when the mmap is created. ie., when events are
> read we know exactly which evsel they correspond to. (See
> perf_evlist__mmap_per_cpu and perf_evlist__mmap_per_thread and add
> struct perf_evsel *evsel entry to struct perf_mmap).

Read that code a bit too quickly. All events for a thread are dropped
into the same buffer so as currently organized there is not an easy
correlation.

David

>
> Commands like perf-record can inject a user event into the stream and
> hence the data file every time the evsel changes while walking all of
> the mmap's reading events -- very similar to the way finished round is
> done. The event would only contain a perf_event_header which is 8 bytes
> so this does not add a lot to a data file. As an optimization the evsel
> event could only be injected if the sample_types differ.
>
> Live commands would just use the evsel connected to the mmap -- no
> lookups needed which would simplify things a bit processing the events.
>
> In short, the information to associate event streams to an event (evsel)
> is currently available -- it's just being discarded in the many layers.
>
> I'll try to whip up some code that implements this in the next few days.
>
> David
>



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-07-11 19:41    [W:0.172 / U:0.344 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site