[lkml]   [2013]   [Jun]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/4] mfd: dbx500-prcmu: Correctly reorder PRCMU clock identifiers
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 1:21 PM, Lee Jones <> wrote:

> ... as stipulated by the Hardware Specification document.
> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <>

I think you need Ulf (as ux500 clock author) and Loic (as PRCMU
developer) to have a look at this.

> -enum prcmu_clock {
> +#define ARMCLK 0
> +#define PRCMU_ACLK 1

It seems the enum and the defines want to do two different things?

The first is a kernel-internal representation of the clocks, whereas
the latter is a HW-centric representation for a certain PRCMU
variant (I guess?)

Does one actually exclude the other?

Linus Walleij

 \ /
  Last update: 2013-06-07 16:01    [W:0.145 / U:0.016 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site