lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Jun]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[net-next PATCH 2/8] macvtap: do not add self to waitqueue if doing a nonblock read
Date
There's no need to add self to waitqueue if doing a nonblock read. This could
help to avoid the spinlock contention.

Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
---
drivers/net/macvtap.c | 7 +++++--
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/macvtap.c b/drivers/net/macvtap.c
index 5e485e3..8949631 100644
--- a/drivers/net/macvtap.c
+++ b/drivers/net/macvtap.c
@@ -845,7 +845,9 @@ static ssize_t macvtap_do_read(struct macvtap_queue *q, struct kiocb *iocb,
ssize_t ret = 0;

while (len) {
- prepare_to_wait(sk_sleep(&q->sk), &wait, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
+ if (!noblock)
+ prepare_to_wait(sk_sleep(&q->sk), &wait,
+ TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);

/* Read frames from the queue */
skb = skb_dequeue(&q->sk.sk_receive_queue);
@@ -867,7 +869,8 @@ static ssize_t macvtap_do_read(struct macvtap_queue *q, struct kiocb *iocb,
break;
}

- finish_wait(sk_sleep(&q->sk), &wait);
+ if (!noblock)
+ finish_wait(sk_sleep(&q->sk), &wait);
return ret;
}

--
1.7.1


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-06-06 12:42    [W:0.062 / U:0.708 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site