lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Jun]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] of: Export of_irq_count for using in modules
On 18:45 Fri 31 May     , Michal Simek wrote:
> On 05/31/2013 05:16 PM, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> > On 15:57 Fri 31 May , Michal Simek wrote:
> >> On 05/31/2013 01:00 PM, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> >>> On 10:14 Fri 31 May , Michal Simek wrote:
> >>>> Hi Jean-Christophe,
> >>>>
> >>>> On 05/30/2013 10:17 PM, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> >>>>> On 15:49 Thu 30 May , Michal Simek wrote:
> >>>>>> Export of_irq_count for modules.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> can you explain why do you need to call of_irq_count
> >>>>
> >>>> I need to count number of irq written in the DTS node.
> >>>> It is not fixed size that's why I need to proper way how to
> >>>> find it out.
> >>>>
> >>>> I am using this loop.
> >>>> count = of_irq_count(pdev->dev.of_node);
> >>>> /* Alloc IRQ based on DTS to be sure that no other driver will use it */
> >>>> while (count--) {
> >>>> tmp->irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(pdev->dev.of_node, count);
> >>>> dev_info(&pdev->dev, "%d: Alloc irq: %d\n", count, tmp->irq);
> >>>> ret = request_irq(tmp->irq, zynq_remoteproc_interrupt, 0,
> >>>> dev_name(&pdev->dev), &pdev->dev);
> >>>> if (ret) {
> >>>> ...
> >>>> }
> >>>> }
> >>>>
> >>>> But of course if you think that this is incorrect to export it
> >>>> I can use what it is in of_irq_count body
> >>>> 368 int of_irq_count(struct device_node *dev)
> >>>> 369 {
> >>>> 370 int nr = 0;
> >>>> 371
> >>>> 372 while (of_irq_to_resource(dev, nr, NULL))
> >>>> 373 nr++;
> >>>> 374
> >>>> 375 return nr;
> >>>> 376 }
> >>>>
> >>>> Because of_irq_to_resource is exported for modules.
> >>>> Or is there any better way how to loop over all interrupts in DT node?
> >>>
> >>> can just explain me why you need to call irq_of_parse_and_map in your driver?
> >>>
> >>> as the irq will be provided in the resources normally
> >>
> >> It is quite a long time I have written this driver on v3.1 or 3.3.
> >> But is this better?
> >>
> >> struct resource *res;
> >> int i = 0;
> >> do {
> >> res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_IRQ, i++);
> >> if (res)
> >> do something
> >> } while(res);
> >>
> >> Also what about of_irq_to_resource()? Is it deprecated and all drivers
> >> shouldn't use it?
> >>
> >> I have no problem to rewrite the driver to use platform_get_resource.
> > yeah it's better but be aware there is a but in DT that I'm working on to fix
> > if you use irq that are registered by a pdev this will not work
> >
> > I hope to fix it for 3.11
> > and already send an RFC that fix it
>
> ok. good to know. Btw: Let's return to my origin point why not to
> export of_irq_count for modules?
> Or opposite question if platform_get_resource is correct way
> why to export of_irq_to_resource for modules?

for old ppc drivers that are not converted yet to pdev

if you can do so just use pdev resource I should have fix the pb or irq_domain
hopefully for 3.11

Best Regards,
J.

>
> Thanks,
> Michal
>
> --
> Michal Simek, Ing. (M.Eng), OpenPGP -> KeyID: FE3D1F91
> w: www.monstr.eu p: +42-0-721842854
> Maintainer of Linux kernel - Microblaze cpu - http://www.monstr.eu/fdt/
> Maintainer of Linux kernel - Xilinx Zynq ARM architecture
> Microblaze U-BOOT custodian and responsible for u-boot arm zynq platform
>
>




\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-06-06 11:21    [W:0.152 / U:0.112 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site