lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Jun]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [Arm-netbook] getting allwinner SoC support upstream (was Re: Uploading linux (3.9.4-1))
From
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 10:59 PM, Henrik Nordström
<henrik@henriknordstrom.net> wrote:

>> .... and then there's the boot0 and boot1 loaders, these *do* have

> no, these are not tiny. boot0 is 24KB to fit the initial embedded SRAM
> (not cache), but boot1 is on pair with u-boot in size and runs from
> DRAM.

btw, please listen to henrik: he knows what he's talking about, as
you can see :) henrik, thank you for correcting my technical
misunderstandings, i'll try to remember them and not propagate
incorrect stuff.

>> so the point is: if anyone wishes me to propose to allwinner that
>> they convert over to devicetree, or any other proposal which involves
>> significant low-level changes to their working practices that could
>> potentially have a massive knock-on effect onto their
>> multi-million-dollar clients, it had better be a damn good story.
>
> Calm down.

i am - honest! yes it's a little past my bed-time, but hey...

> It isn't really a significant difference to them outside of
> the kernel. They do not need to change any of their configuraiton
> methods, only a small toolchain change in how the resultig images are
> built to have a corresponding device tree built.

henrik, jon (smirl), can i ask you both a favour? could you write
something up, preferably short, that i could put forward to allwinner?
describing what's needed, who would need to do what and so on.


> But it is a fair bit of one-time changes kernel side. And some
> scratching to figure out how to use/improve/ignore the stuff being
> mainlined.

i still also - really - need a good justification for this.
something which helps explain clearly what the immediate or perhaps
strategic benefits would be to allwinner, as to why they should accept
such changes. i cannot emphasise enough how important that is.

if someone can please help come up with a good justification as to
why allwinner should change their working practices, that would be
enormously helpful i feel, to solving this issue.

otherwise we are stuck in the current situation which nobody really
likes. i'm inviting you - linux kernel developers - i'm giving you an
opportunity to *fix* things. you have 2 weeks to come up with a
solution, which can be presented in a simple format. that's the
window of opportunity.

l.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-06-06 01:41    [W:0.284 / U:0.672 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site