lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Jun]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    Subject[PATCH 0/2] jfs: neatening
    Date
    The second patch is speculative and maybe not necessary.

    Is a 3KB reduction in object size when embedded and !CONFIG_PRINTK worth it?

    Joe Perches (2):
    jfs: Update jfs_error
    jfs: Reduce object size when CONFIG_PRINTK=n

    fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c | 70 +++++++++++++++++++------------------------------
    fs/jfs/jfs_dtree.c | 37 +++++++++++++-------------
    fs/jfs/jfs_extent.c | 2 +-
    fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c | 69 ++++++++++++++++++++----------------------------
    fs/jfs/jfs_metapage.c | 5 ++--
    fs/jfs/jfs_superblock.h | 17 +++++++++++-
    fs/jfs/jfs_txnmgr.c | 2 +-
    fs/jfs/jfs_xtree.c | 62 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
    fs/jfs/namei.c | 2 +-
    fs/jfs/resize.c | 2 +-
    fs/jfs/super.c | 24 ++++++++++-------
    fs/jfs/xattr.c | 4 +--
    12 files changed, 142 insertions(+), 154 deletions(-)

    --
    1.8.1.2.459.gbcd45b4.dirty



    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2013-06-05 07:41    [W:2.080 / U:0.264 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site