Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 3 Jun 2013 15:30:10 +0100 | From | Matthew Garrett <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/4] EFI 1:1 mapping |
| |
On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 07:27:22AM -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
> That's correct. I think not calling SetVirtualAddressMap() and just > using a 1:1 mapping is far safer (having looked at what tianocore does > for SetVirtualAddressMap()). The chances are that all the UEFI bioses > are only tested with windows, so the pointer chases it has to do to > switch address maps only work with the operations windows does.
Windows calls SetVirtualAddressMap(), so the only way these systems have been tested is with SetVirtualAddressMap().
-- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org
| |