lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Jun]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] MTD: atmel_nand: using a stronger ECC is not dangerous
On 5/31/2013 10:34 PM, Richard Genoud wrote:
> We don't have to issue a warning when a stronger error correting
> capability is chosen.
>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@gmail.com>

Acked-by: Josh Wu <josh.wu@atmel.com>

Best Regards,
Josh Wu

> ---
> drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c
> index 2d23d29..2415cdc 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c
> @@ -1002,7 +1002,7 @@ static int __init atmel_pmecc_nand_init_params(struct platform_device *pdev,
> return err_no;
> }
>
> - if (cap != host->pmecc_corr_cap ||
> + if (cap > host->pmecc_corr_cap ||
> sector_size != host->pmecc_sector_size)
> dev_info(host->dev, "WARNING: Be Caution! Using different PMECC parameters from Nand ONFI ECC reqirement.\n");
>



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-06-03 08:42    [W:0.076 / U:0.312 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site