lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Jun]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: cgroup: status-quo and userland efforts
Quoting Tejun Heo (tj@kernel.org):
> Hello, Serge.
>
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 01:14:57PM -0500, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> > I should find a good, up-to-date summary of the current behaviors of
> > each controller so I can talk more intelligently about it. (I'll
> > start by looking at the kernel Documentation/cgroups, but don't
> > feel too confident that they'll be uptodate :)
>
> Heh, it's hopelessly outdated. Sorry about that. I'll get around to
> updating it eventually. Right now everything is in flux.
>
> > Right, I'm not attached to my toy implementation at all - except for
> > the ability, in some fashion, to have nested agents which don't have
> > cgroupfs access but talk to another agent to get the job done.
>
> I think it probably would be better to allow organization and RO

What do you mean by "organization"? Creating cgroups and moving tasks
between them, without setting other cgroup values?

> access to knobs and stat files inside containers, for lower overhead,
> if nothing else, and have comm channel for operations which need
> supervision at a wider level.
>
> Thanks.
>
> --
> tejun


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-06-27 21:21    [W:0.123 / U:0.160 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site