lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Jun]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v4 2/7] cpufreq: Add boost frequency support in core
On Thu, 27 Jun 2013 15:55:26 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 27 June 2013 15:18, Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, 27 Jun 2013 14:32:57 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>
> > I thought about this idea, but at cpufreq_boost_trigger_state_sw()
> > I iterate through all available policies and call
> > cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo()[*] on them. In this routine [*] I
> > use cpufreq_boost_enabled() [**] route to search for maximal (boost)
> > frequency.
> > The [**] reads boost_enabled flag, which shall be updated before.
> > When this search fails, then I restore the old value of
> > boost_enabled.
>
> Ok.

OK
>
> >> >> > + else
> >> >> > + ret =
> >> >> > cpufreq_boost_trigger_state_sw();
> >>
> >> then why not enable_boost_sw() here? that would be more
> >> relevant.
> >
> > Could you be more specific here?
>
> I meant rename cpufreq_boost_trigger_state_sw() to
> enable_boost_sw() :)

No problem:
- For SW there will be
cpufreq_boost_trigger_state_sw() renamed to enable_boost_sw()

- For HW:
cpufreq_driver->enable_boost(state) renamed to
cpufreq_driver->enable_boost_hw();

--
Best regards,

Lukasz Majewski

Samsung R&D Institute Poland (SRPOL) | Linux Platform Group


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-06-27 14:01    [W:0.143 / U:9.840 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site